AI Product Builder & Leader

What I Build

Things I’ve built and what happened.

For each product: the problem, my judgment, and the outcome.

Maturity scale

  • Prototype
  • Alpha
  • Beta
  • MVP
  • GA
Building responsibly intelligent products.

A governed agent architecture keeps human authority above policy and permission gates, a bounded orchestration workflow, and observed evidence used to review, learn, and adapt.

  1. Human authorityIntent · approval · escalation
  2. Governance gatePolicy · permissions · evidence
  3. OrchestratorContext, allowed tools, and a bounded Plan · Act · Evaluate workflow
  4. Observed evidenceResults · traces · decisions
  5. Review · learn · adapt
Product case · BridgeLine 1 / 3

BridgeLine

MVP

Two-sided CAF-veteran talent intelligence

The problem
Military capability does not translate cleanly into civilian pathways or credible hiring evidence.
My call
Build one translation layer for veterans and employers, then plug it into the talent systems customers already use.
What I traded
Narrow the individual proposition to the transition moment; pause development while market fit remains unresolved.
Outcomes
A working MVP and design-partner evidence. No product-market-fit claim.

Customer identified only as a Canadian Schedule I bank. Assessment IP, customer data, and implementation detail are omitted.

The two-sided system · reconstructed
The product:two-sided talent intelligence · five tools building an eight-pillar profile CAF members, veterans, reservists five tools build an eight-pillar profile BridgeLine Career Affinity Engine deterministic, O*NET- grounded scoring no black-box match math plugs in Existing HRIS / talent platform not a replacement fit evidence Talent acquisition source → screen → interview → hire decision support only Boundary:augments the customer's talent system — does not recreate it Two sides:one credible translation Individual side Translatemilitary KSAs into civilian pathways Navigatetransition and reservist career changes Enterprise side Demonstrateveteran capability as an advantage De-riskhiring a capable, fast-learning group Discovery decision NarrowedB2C: corporate-deep veterans saw low value Focusedon the transition moment, not broad careers
Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 04 / 19
Product case · BridgeLine 2 / 3

BridgeLine

MVP

Translate capability, then support the decision

Two-sided service blueprint · reconstructed
Public view · implementation detail omitted

Individual journey

StartMilitary experienceKnowledge, skills, abilities, and goals
TranslateBuild a career profileMake capability legible in civilian language
UseExplore credible pathwaysSupport the transition moment and next step

Employer journey

StartRole and organization needDefine what success requires
CompareReview fit evidenceCandidate, role, and organization in one view
DecideUse the existing hiring processEvidence informs people; it does not automate hiring

Product boundaryAugments the customer’s talent system rather than recreating it.

Discovery boundaryFocuses on the transition moment; market fit remains unresolved.

The judgment. Build one transparent translation layer for both sides, then fit it into the hiring journey customers already use. Why I made these calls

Translate instead of replace. The product makes military capability legible while leaving the customer’s hiring system and decision authority intact.

Make the evidence inspectable. Fit evidence should help a candidate or hiring manager understand the reasoning rather than ask them to trust an unexplained match.

Stop when the market evidence says stop. Discovery narrowed the individual proposition to the transition moment, and development remains paused while product-market fit is unresolved.

Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 05 / 19
Product case · BridgeLine 3 / 3

BridgeLine

MVP

Product evidence and the market-fit boundary

Real product surfaces. The veteran side builds an eight-pillar Career Profile; the hiring-manager side reads it against a client's job architecture through Career Affinity Engine scores, fit tiers, and Talent Affinity Reports—fit made legible, decisions kept human.

Veteran view · Career Profile
BridgeLine Career Profile screen: five tools, eight pillars — Profile Builder, Interest Profiler, Work Values Matcher, and Work Styles Assessment, shown for a demo user.
Hiring-manager view · job architecture — client name redacted
BridgeLine job-architecture explorer for an anonymized Canadian chartered bank: taxonomy columns from sectors through functions, families, profiles, and titles, with a JATL career-matrix detail panel.
Hiring-manager view · Talent Map — fit made defensible
BridgeLine Talent Map filtered to Exceptional Fit: taxonomy nodes with Career Affinity Engine scores, and a job-title preview modal showing an 80.7 score with a Generate Talent Affinity Report action.
Roadmap · funding-contingent

An AI-native intake experience, an AI career coach, and dual-use transition onboarding for defence + corporate experience.

Assessed rationale

Blue Ocean and systems analyses are my assessed case for staying close to the opportunity—not a market-fact claim.

Status

Working MVP—five tools and proprietary profile logic. Development paused while the market-fit question stays open.

Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 06 / 19
Product case · GrantSniper 1 / 3

GrantSniper

MVP

Dual-use non-dilutive capital and market intelligence

The problem
Lean dual-use teams face a fragmented path from funding need to a credible first draft.
My call
Productize the repeatable slice of a service engagement: research, qualify, prioritize, and guide the first draft.
What I traded
Serve a focused dual-use market; stop before broad integrations, a generic directory, or full proposal lifecycle.
Outcomes
Approximately $50K paid design-partner engagement; internal use continues. No grant-win or ROI claim.

The Canadian biotech client is anonymized; its proposals, funding specifics, and source material are excluded.

The workflow · funding need → submission-ready draft
Research company & market Qualify fit criteria Agent research funding sources Pipeline prioritized · fit-assessed Eligibility permitted envelopes Guided draft rich-text & chat Export Markdown handoff agent-assisted · domain-informed · human-refined
Opportunity pipeline · ranked by fit
GrantSniper opportunity pipeline listing Canadian non-dilutive funding programs with funder, funding range, fit score, and review status.
Origin · forward-deployed

Serve first. Deliver the engagement, find the repeatable decision path, then productize the bounded tool.

Focused thesis

Depth over directory breadth. Concentrate on a dual-use context where domain knowledge can improve which funding bets deserve attention.

Public evidence

Paid design-partner work. Approximately $50K engagement; internal use continues. No grant-win or ROI claim.

Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 07 / 19
Product case · GrantSniper 2 / 3

GrantSniper

MVP

From funding need to human-reviewed draft

Decision journey · from funding thesis to human-owned submission
Four decision moments · human authority retained

What the team decides

OrientDefine the funding thesisAlign company stage, market, financing strategy, and non-dilutive need.
ChooseSelect credible opportunitiesCompare evidence, eligibility, fit, and gaps; focus on bets worth the team’s time.
CreateBuild a defensible first draftTurn requirements and approved facts into a workable starting point.
OwnReview, refine, and submitThe team verifies claims, edits the narrative, and owns the final decision.

Bounded MVPStops at idea-to-first-draft instead of becoming a generic grants platform.

Human authorityPeople decide eligibility, fit, claims, edits, and whether anything is submitted.

Evidence boundaryApproximately $50K paid engagement; no grant-win or ROI claim.

The judgment. Productize the repeatable decision path while keeping funding claims and submission authority with the human team. Why I made these calls

Compete through focus. The product concentrates on a dual-use and research-product context where accumulated domain knowledge can improve which opportunities deserve attention.

Stop at the useful boundary. Research, qualification, prioritization, and a guided first draft create value without taking responsibility for the final proposal.

Keep consequential decisions human. Evidence can accelerate a recommendation, but the team still owns eligibility, fit, factual claims, editing, and submission.

Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 08 / 19
Product case · GrantSniper 3 / 3

GrantSniper

MVP

Guided decision and MVP tradeoffs

From a prioritized pipeline to a defensible draft: the product walks the team from a fit decision through eligibility into guided submission writing—and deliberately stops there.

Grant detail · fit made discussable
GrantSniper grant-detail screen for NRC IRAP showing an overall fit assessment, client-alignment evidence, strengths, risks, gaps, and next steps.
Guided submission · human review stays in the loop
GrantSniper guided-submission workspace with a human-editable proposal outline, draft content, recorded facts, assistant progress, and review controls.
Deliberate trade-off

Idea to first draft, then stop. No broad platform integrations, multi-draft lifecycle, or generic directory. The MVP stays deep on the recurring decision.

Decision evidence

Make fit discussable. Research, eligibility, gaps, and confidence support a human choice rather than presenting a score as an answer.

Outcome, honestly stated

An incomplete commercial observation. The engagement ended after client-side turnover: not a grant win, not a failure, and not an ROI claim. Internal use continues.

Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 09 / 19
Product case · Leadership Assessment Intelligence 1 / 2

Leadership Assessment Intelligence

GA

Guarded AI workflows for assessment and search

The problem
Expert assessment value was buried in slow preparation and dense reports clients had to interpret.
My call
Use guarded AI inside an internal service before asking the organization or clients to adopt standalone SaaS.
What I traded
Keep calibration, client alignment, and expert sign-off human; defer a self-serve product surface.
Outcomes
Preparation measured in days or hours moved to minutes. These workflows support judgment; they do not automate hiring.
The judgment. Start as a guarded internal service, not standalone SaaS. That fit the organization's adoption constraints and reduced expert drafting from hours to an approximately five-minute review while keeping calibration and sign-off human. Why I made these calls

Prove value before asking people to adopt another product. Limited engineering support, mixed digital confidence, and caution toward new AI tools made an internal service the right first move. It delivered value inside tools people already used.

A recommendation is not a decision. The agent proposes high, medium, or low priority for each competency and explains why. The client must agree before any candidate is scored; those agreed priorities become the rule for the second workflow.

Automate drafting, not expert judgment. Discovery showed that clients valued interpretation, not another chart. The agent drafts in the experts' established reasoning and language; experts turn that draft into the client-ready view in about five minutes.

The system · two guarded workflows, one pipeline · reconstructed
Client / executive search firm role & JD · interview call — org, culture, situation Workflow one · competency calibration days → minutes Context intake role & JD · client interview · analyst research, together Guarded reasoning agent bounded reasoning · internal-service guardrails agent Weightings + rationale competency priorities · high / med / low — each with the why Human review customer-success sign-off before anything leaves Alignment brief client & search firm: “do you agree?” → agreed weightings agreed weightings Workflow two · decision-ready insight hours → minutes Scoring & role fit candidate evidence viewed against agreed priorities algorithm Radar chart the candidate profile, made visual Guarded insight agent drafts expert insights — founder · science team · CS expertise agent Expert review & package hours of multi-party drafting → a quick sign-off Discovery, from the client calls: buyers pay for the expert opinion — not for charts to interpret themselves. Client / search firm packaged report delivered · ~5-minute review, not hours
Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 10 / 19
Product case · Leadership Assessment Intelligence 2 / 2

Leadership Assessment Intelligence

GA

From data to visual, and the value stream

∼$50K estimated annual capacity saved — a conservative, proposed value-creation estimate, not a realized or underwritten saving. No salary or runway figures.
Operating constraint

Limited engineering support and organization-wide AI caution shaped the design: an internal service model, deliberate guardrails, and outputs in the tools people already use.

What this case shows

Forward-deployed product judgment under real adoption constraints—shipping guarded value inside the organization's trust envelope instead of forcing a new surface.

Workflow three · team-development visual preparation ~1 hour → ~5 minutes
Spreadsheet inputs refreshable · familiar tools
Formula-driven preparation rebuilt flow, no new app to adopt
Excel visuals team development
PowerPoint-ready where the users already work
The value stream · hours to minutes, twice over
Rebuilding visuals — automated spreadsheets ~1 hour ~5 minutes Adjusting deliverables — client-feedback turnaround hours minutes
Bradley Hartwick · Product Portfolio · v1 11 / 19